Reduction of JET ALTs in Miyagi, or the "spiral of death"
I recently got an email from one of my supervisors informing me that my prefecture, Miyagi, has decided to switch from hiring assistant language teachers provided by JET to hiring ALTs via a private company, on a "trial basis". It would appear the prefecture is in a bit of a financial quandary, and they've decided to "clean house". While this only applies to senior high positions (and only new hires, meaning nobody is going to lose their job), it's a bit sad that they have to resort to measures like this to balance their budget.
How is a private ALT different than a JET ALT? Well, the truth is there isn't any real difference. Private ALTs only come to school on days when they are needed, which means that you don't have to pay them during spring and summer vacations. In theory, administrative costs from managing all the senior high ALTs centrally get reduced, though I'm not sure how. And finally, you don't have to supply them with housing because they're not employed directly by the schools or the government. It sounds like a great deal on the surface.
But there are some problems that the central government seems to be ignoring. The biggest problem will be psychological support. It sounds stupid, but hear me out. JET provides lists of foreigner language teachers who all work in the same area. It gets damn lonely in the inaka and sometimes it's necessary to speak to someone else who speaks English natively, just to stay sane. If communication between JETs and private ALTs is mismanaged (considering the current administrators can't even get it together enough to unite the Sendai city and Miyagi prefecture contact lists), the support network of other foreigners will be effectively cut in half for both groups. And we're already spread quite thin as it is. And ALTs who go a bit crazy from being stuck on a small social island tend not to recontract for a second year, or even break contract early and run home. I can pretty much guarantee with this plan that retainment rates are going to plummet. And in the end, this winds up costing the government more money-- plane tickets to fly people here aren't free. But worse of all, it leaves us with a dearth of experienced ALTs and a vacuum of continuity.
To be fair, I don't know why they hire so many senior high ALTs in the first place. In Japan, high school students are divided up into two groups. One group gets into a preparatory high school and spends three years getting ready for college entrance exams. Since the English component consists of a multiple-choice grammar test with no speaking requirement and a pitiful listening component, these students have little use for an ALT. Perhaps 2 percent of these students will become English majors; a quarter of those will study abroad and finally learn how to speak English, maybe half will have a good teacher in their Japanese university and learn to speak English passably, and the rest will go on to become English teachers in senior and junior high. The second group is in an agricultural or trade school. This is the group that will grow up to be farmers, factory workers, and 7-11 clerks in their hometown, and have no reason to use or study English. The second group doesn't need ALTs, and the first group can't make use of them unless there are massive changes in the examination process and secondary education structure. I've come to realize that as a foreigner, I will never be in a position to make these changes even on a local scale.
Miyagi, along with most other prefectures in Japan, would be better off taking those senior high ALTs (along with more than a few of the junior high teachers) and assigning them full time to elementary schools. Why? Because that's where we do the most good. English education in junior and senior high schools is a broken parody of language instruction. It's so bad that after a year of junior high most students just give up on being able to speak English, ever. And their "solution" is shoveling in handfuls of "assistant teachers" who are undertrained and have no authority to even teach classes on their own, let alone select textbooks or curricula. That said, why would things be any better with the younger grades?
In elementary schools, things are a bit different. There's no textbook and no national curriculum. There is no English component to the junior high entrance exams (thank God), meaning that elementary school teachers don't have to shoehorn grammar points and long government vocabulary lists into their lessons. There are no deadlines that decide what lessons must happen and when. And there's no exam guillotine looming on the horizon. The end result is that English lessons in elementary school are interactive, open-ended, and fun for the students, as well as being less stressful for the teachers. There's no temptation to take shortcuts like memorizing lists of words or teaching obscure grammatical jargon, as there's no point to doing so.
Most of the teachers in elementary school teach all subjects to one class, so they aren't English specialists. But rather than being a problem, this actually prevents situations where the ALT feels like he's stepping on the "real" teacher's toes. The ALT needs the homeroom teacher to help control the class, and the homeroom teacher needs the ALT to actually design and present the lesson. In a junior high or senior high lesson, the assistant and "real" teacher are often at odds, because they have different goals and different abilities: the Japanese teacher is trying to prepare the students for the test, while the ALT is trying to teach the kids to communicate in English. The Japanese teacher ostensibly has qualifications and status as an English teacher in Japan, while the ALT speaks and writes English with more fluency than the JTE will ever attain. This leads to situations in which either the ALT or JTE feel marginalized or even hostile toward each other. In elementary schools there is less overlap of skills and no conflict of interest, so this enmity is generally less likely to exist.
Most likely, this "trial" period will only last a year or two, until the budgetary committees get their act together. But the damage to the English teaching community will already be done.