<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: perspective</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.randomwisdom.com/2005/07/342/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.randomwisdom.com/2005/07/342</link>
	<description>photos, electronic projects, and other random stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 04:38:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big George</title>
		<link>http://www.randomwisdom.com/2005/07/342/comment-page-1#comment-38478</link>
		<dc:creator>Big George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2005 02:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomwisdom.com/2005/07/342/#comment-38478</guid>
		<description>The problems and implications of self-representation has for some time a matter of my endless fascination. My own little LJ page, with its sporadic updates and peculiar non-sequiturs, its rambling, its prior expression of opinions and feelings I can neither presently claim to nor even to hold, has created in my mind a lot of questions in its own right. 

I&#039;ve been self-conscious for a while, for example, of the fact that the single greatest enabler to my personally venturing to make a post is having my tongue firmly in cheek. Satirizing the very representation I self-consciously construct on such a forum is one of the things I most enjoy -- by creating, for example, a version of myself that I, for my own part, find both humorous and amusing. 

I&#039;ve noticed also (as a sociology student commenting on an old post of mine was only too keen to bring to my attention) was that only thing that often prevents such a tongue-in-cheek construct from appearing obnoxious and even incendiary is the inside-knowledge of who I am; not only do I almost purposely misrepresent myself, but I seem to do so in a very specific way: without, in fact, deviating too much from who I really am.

I have rather a distrust for the supposed stability of meaning underlying such self-representations. What, I ask, do our blog personas truly signify? And is that thing being signified, in fact, stable and unchanging?

Perhaps I can be accused of flaunting this very distrust with gleeful abandon.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problems and implications of self-representation has for some time a matter of my endless fascination. My own little LJ page, with its sporadic updates and peculiar non-sequiturs, its rambling, its prior expression of opinions and feelings I can neither presently claim to nor even to hold, has created in my mind a lot of questions in its own right. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been self-conscious for a while, for example, of the fact that the single greatest enabler to my personally venturing to make a post is having my tongue firmly in cheek. Satirizing the very representation I self-consciously construct on such a forum is one of the things I most enjoy &#8212; by creating, for example, a version of myself that I, for my own part, find both humorous and amusing. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve noticed also (as a sociology student commenting on an old post of mine was only too keen to bring to my attention) was that only thing that often prevents such a tongue-in-cheek construct from appearing obnoxious and even incendiary is the inside-knowledge of who I am; not only do I almost purposely misrepresent myself, but I seem to do so in a very specific way: without, in fact, deviating too much from who I really am.</p>
<p>I have rather a distrust for the supposed stability of meaning underlying such self-representations. What, I ask, do our blog personas truly signify? And is that thing being signified, in fact, stable and unchanging?</p>
<p>Perhaps I can be accused of flaunting this very distrust with gleeful abandon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

